Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Composing on the Internet

Since I have not yet begun teaching, and have never formally taught in the past, it is difficult to summarize my views on a field I have not really thought about until a few days ago. However, many of the points raised in Yancey’s paper seem very important, particularly her discussion of how students learn writing in a variety of ways on their own which they are discouraged from using in an academic setting, and how different mediums create different sorts of writers.

Students learn to write in a variety of places, namely the internet, but the style of writing developed there is not encouraged in class. I don’t think this itself is a bad thing, since academic writing should probably be more structured than, say, a blog post. Instead of trying to use blogs or other new forms of communication to connect to students, perhaps more important is creating the motivation for writing in the first place. In class a student is required to write a paper, while on the internet they choose to write a blog (or other sort of communication). I don’t think the method of writing is really the problem - getting the students interested in the topic seems more important. Simply turning a paper into a blog post doesn’t remove the nature of the assignment: it’s still an assignment.

This also connects to Yancey’s discussion of writers created by different mediums. Would a writer created by the medium of a blog really be more desirable than a writer created by the medium of the printed page, at least as far as academic writing is concerned? Again, I think this has less to do with the medium than the motivation, or the content of what is written. A huge variety of writing exists on the internet, just as a huge variety of writing exists on the printed page. Different arrangements of text and other opportunities are presented in different mediums, but without the proper motivation or content, they are each as vacant as the next.

If students who would rather spend their time on the internet writing blogs or posting on forums is the problem, turning writing assignments into blogs and forums is not the solution. A student is no more going to want to write a blog as an assignment than a paper as an assignment. Just because they like writing blogs on their own time doesn’t mean they want to write blogs for a class.

That all seems kind of negative... I did find Yancey’s discussion of remediation to be particularly interesting, and think that this sort of use of different technologies could be rewarding, since the focus there is on the actual content, and how it changes in different mediums.

1 comment:

  1. Even though you've never taught before, you seem to be already thinking like a teacher. Congratulations (!?)

    First off, while I appreciate your engagement w/ Yancey here, I'll push you a bit (as I have most of your classmates) to work on engaging a bit more if, for nothing else, than the fact that providing a bit more summary, a few more quotes, etc, will provide YOU with some nice reading notes to go back to when you begin working on your final project.

    Second, I'm taken by two of your (relating) points: 1) Instead of trying to use blogs or other new forms of communication to connect to students, perhaps more important is creating the motivation for writing in the first place. and 2)Simply turning a paper into a blog post doesn’t remove the nature of the assignment: it’s still an assignment.

    I quite like the notion of "creating the motivation for writing" and the acknowledgment that putting things online doesn't make it immediately sexy or fun. It's just, now, an assignment online. I think, in this way, you're doing some great thinking already about why (and why not) to teach with technology.

    Does a blog necessarily make something more relevant? fun? Does it somehow change the space of writing in such a way that it creates new and useful challenges? Or does it just reproduce the same 'ol same 'ol that a paper on 8.5"x11" would do?

    Good questions. Keep pushing!

    ReplyDelete